> On Sunday, 9 July 2017 04:42:51 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
> > More balderdash from uk.sci.weather:
> > On Saturday, 8 July 2017 12:01:57 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
> > > On Friday, 16 June 2017 11:20:44 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Although John's report suggests more melting of the Arctic sea ice cap, these two charts show nothing to get excited about.
> > > > http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/meanTarchive/meanT_2017.png
> > > > http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/
> > > >
> > > > But we live in interesting times!
> > >
> > > We do indeed. We have an acknowledged expert telling us he used to do the ice for the Met Office or some such place.
> > >
> > > I see that the ice build up in Antarctica was comprehensive through [2011 up to 2015 edited]. Do you suppose the Larsen Ice-field has suffered as a function of over-abundance or are you going to stick with the pack?
> >
> > [There is a large crack in the sea ice that is known as calving that is going to be producing an herd of icebergs the size of islands in the Caribbean. Such a phenomenon is a regular growth cycle, as ice flows flow, down south.
> >
> > > When large amounts of ice forms it tends to drop the temperature to the bottom of the sea, being cold, dense brine. Right?
> > >
> > > What the OP should have stated is that a close-up in the surface cover actually indicates storms, not heating. But I am not the only one for whom maths poses difficulty apparently.
> >
> > [These so called experts dwell on a single aspect: Area not actual quantity.]
> >
> > > Without putting a storm archive on the graph page for cross-reference, it ends up becoming nonsense. So one has to ask the question: "What are the experts thinking?" or even: "Are the experts thinking?" to be honest I quit posting [t]here because it became obvious that none of the f*cking experts were thinking and I didn't want to be associated with such losers, never mind their insistence on ignoring the finest forecaster on the planet.
> >
> > [Or at least the only one I am sure is asking for extra terrestrial help.]
> >
> > > I dare say I have hurt some of them but while they have their heads in the clouds they might have been [productively] looking at sea surface pressures.
> > >
> > > The puzzle now clarifies to how the ice build-up tends to follow volcanic periods.
> >
> > If they are honest with themselves they will pull the data apart and realise that the sea ice has built up to its natural limit and when the conditions changed, the huge raft had begun to shatter.
> >
> > In continental weather patterns in the northern hemisphere the ice break up generally cracks in the spring in some places with an huge report, I have read, sounds like a quarry blast.
> >
> > I believe this happens every spring following a cold winter. I have no personal experience with it. But there are videos online showing glaciers calving regular as the seasons.
> >
> > For thousands of years we have known (as a species) that this is all a part of the climate of colder lands that has existed since Noah's day. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
> >
> > I promised to put in two halfpence worth when they had had time to reconsider. If they fail to do so I am tempted to show them the whale.
> >
> > I have not done the research but I am sure my theory will turn out correct. Previous large ice field break ups will show a large amount of growth in the preceding four or five years.
> >
> > IIRC there was a phase in the Larsen field, following 4 years of growth, that the ice field remained at the statistical average (there is a base line on the chart that remains after you clear the field. So a layer of honesty is presented with the data.)
> >
> > I left the group in disgust because the experts failed to point that out to the gullible.
> >
> > So now when I eventually post this argument on my blog there will be pictures so anyone can see there is no such thing as climate change. I believe their own personal interests will not allow them to see what they do not wish to see.
> >
> > Such people will be left to fend for themselves when the Four horsemen pass through the land.
> >
> > First comes truth, then come decision time. Then comes the result of believing the lies. This is the product of the four horsemen. Their agency is not particularly evil.
> > They do not harm the oil or the wine.
>
> It is amazing what you see when you look:
>
> http://weatherlawyer.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/#7468527589542178954
I feel that I have learned so much in the past few days since I started this thread that it it seems like I wrote it years ago. Consider what this means in the light of the idea that a planetary alignment is responsible for the massive activity on the oceans at the same time that all these volcanoes erupt whilst eathquakes take place one after the other:
Tropical Storm Tracker: There are 7 active systems as of 21 Jul, 19:44 GMT http://www.tropicalstormrisk.com/
Volcanoes Today, 20 Jul 2017: Fuego volcano, Karymsky, Klyuchevskoy, Turrialba, Sangay, Sinabung, Sabancaya
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/volcano_news.html
for example and all of that actually moderates these things:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=earthquake&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPv9qbk5vVAhXhL8AKHVpHDmIQ_AUICigB&biw=1024&bih=611
Not that the dead are any less dead.
All creation is crying out to god and here is what they are saying one to another:
"Every animal is going out to be killed one way or another by an animal."
Wouldn't that be nice if it were not so -of the overproduction of fecundity could be controlled in some way. Or would we do away with puppies?
Consider this:
You will hear reports of earthquake in one place after another
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/b/r1/lp-e/nwt/E/2013/40/24#study=discover
Look out that nobody misleads you, we know religions are scams even charities. I have no idea how much the directors of OxFam get (32 charity bosses paid over £200,000 last year - Telegraph) but the Socialist leaders of the Clinton Foundation became a multimillionaire over decades as misrulers of the largest government enterprise in human history.
Meanwhile one of the Popes officers (Cardinal Orgy) is in the news after some 1500 years of enforced celibacy, contrary to biblical teaching. Work that one out!
So either Jesus Christ was a scam, a fairy tale or true. And when he said that nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in one place after another. All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress either he knew about planetary alignments or he didn't.
And regardless of that (assuming I have understood all of this stuff correctly) By Nilfanion - Created using WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Tracks. The background image is from NASA [1]. The tracking data is from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center's best track database, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2505727 and all the gubbins that goes with it which I touched in the above paragraphs, has been happening since before Noah got into the ark-building/world saving business.
By the way I assumed a <5.5M or larger was going to set off a Fijian bound tropical storm next only to be proven wrong by the Japanese bound one.
There are 4 active NW Pacific systems as of 21 Jul, 20:41 GMT
5.5 M. 92km ESE of Port-Vila, Vanuatu 2017-07-21 at 08:59 (UTC)
So what do you think is going to happen at the end of the month?
I wanted it that way
https://youtu.be/cFRk0FfaQi0?list=RDcFRk0FfaQi0
I think that any love is good lovin'
And so I took what I could get
