Moron the Greenland High

From a Linux thread

On Friday, 24 November 2017 06:35:15 UTC, Daniel60  wrote:
> On 24/11/2017 6:18 AM, Michael McNeil wrote:
> > On Thursday, 23 November 2017 12:20:26 UTC, Daniel60  wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2017 7:39 PM, Michael McNeil wrote:
> >>> If we run into severe radio interference over the next few days is it possible to work out what software falls down most often?
> >>>
> >>> That is, would anyone be reporting on the types of complaints monitored?
> >>>
> >> Why might we be expecting severe radio interference over the next couple
> >> of days?? Sunspot maximum or some such??
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >
> > Because the Greenland High always produces it. Always.
> > They come with volcanic eruptions as you can tell by the devolution of weather fronts; a depression that is filled with anticyclonic air breaks down in the North Atlantic sending the warm fronts north and the cold fronts east, following a volcanic eruption and producing the large number of polar points that arrive with the High.
> >
> > They can be forecast from the dissolution of the anticyclone into a col or a multiple complex Low. As the points separate, the diameter opens wider and the fronts leave.
> >
> > You can call it lizards breeding chem-trails or angels dancing if you like but it is undeniably happening:
> > https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/surface-pressure/#?tab=surfacePressureColour&fcTime=1511308800
> >
> > If the diameter is large enough the skies clear and we can see mares tails forming, a sure sign of imminent hurricanes or typhoons of greater than category 3.
> >
> > HTH.
> >
> > If you are still with me, you can see for yourself the record that matches large eruptions with solar winds, I dare say you already know where to look, do you?
> >
> I'll just go and get the stepladder, Michael, as that was all waaayyyy
> over my head!! ;-P
>
> Daniel

I think you will understand scientific stuff a lot more readily if you reject what you can not understand initially, until you have accommodated what you do understand, -maintaining that it is not you that is thick so much as they that might be wrong.

Consider:

One of my earliest postings dealt with `blocking highs`, which I tied in with cold waves over Europe. Wherever they form over polar belts in the cold months, blocking highs are wont to make for anomalous patterns of temperature, be it above or below what is `normal` for the area in question.

I am guessing that he has already lost the reader to Coronation Street

A blocking high is marked by relatively high pressure through a deep layer of the atmosphere. In the Northern Hemisphere, steering winds tend to wheel about such a high in a clockwise sense about a broad core having weak wind flow.

And they only came in here for this.

Such highs can spread for 2000 or more miles (3000 or more km) in all directions. Where such a high is found instead of the usual westerlies aloft (the jet stream), the west-to-east progression of lows (wave cyclones) and cold fronts is disrupted. [Hang on, wait... how did it get there.] Indeed, it may be shunted far to the north by the block, which would likely pump warm air towards the Pole; or shifted southwards, which can lead to stronger, wetter lows/fronts than accustomed in the mid latitudes.

If I were you I'd be lost by now. His problem is that he doesn't know what he is talking about. No offence meant, none of them do. That is what little they understand about anomalies.
Think!
Your not thick so how did the cold air get up in to the top of the sky in order to fall down; especially with at that there global warming that they are all convinced is happening?

Such a blocking high will likely set up shop over the northern Atlantic basin including Greenland and Iceland at the latter half of this week. [I just noticed this:] The western limb of the high will drive anomalous warmth northwards and westwards over Greenland to the Baffin Bay. [Guess why?] At week`s end, even Baffin Island itself will likely warm anomalously.

I bet you understood that last paragraph - proving you are not particularly dense. It is just that they are fake science. But they are honest people and should not be derided.

Now, when a blocking high is parked east of northern North America, the usual dumping ground for Arctic air offloading the continent, whatever Arctic air is present must go somewhere else.

[Why?
Why can't it just mix?]

Invariably, that `somewhere else` is to follow a more southerly path that takes in eastern Canada and at least some of the United States. Well, this is precisely what is being forecast by a consensus of computer models for the end of this week and the first half (at least) of the next.

[And how the hell does it go somewhere else?
FedEx?]

Canada`s `storehouse of cold` is not fully stocked right now (northern Quebec and most of Nunavut have the truly cold stuff). However, the Arctic Ocean basin off north-western North America and north-eastern Asia is shown to grow steadily colder for the next few days with north-westerly wind flow set to pour some of this Arctic cold into the heart of Canada.

From here, it will be free to take the `straight shot` over the line to the eastern two-thirds of the United States. [What have you learned so far?] From here, the cold will take the path of least resistance in an attempt to re-join the west-to-east trend of the jet stream: out to sea from the Eastern Seaboard.

https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/andrews/what-is-a-green/2093

Am I to be castigated for a different view point?
From Wikipedia's effort:
The sea-level pressure (atmospheric pressure) rarely, if ever, exceeds 1055.0 millibars (1055.0 hectopascals)(hPa)(SI).

 1050's are very rare hence I was prompted to make a post to Linux groups, expecting a lot of interference with people's connections.
Am I right?

So why do they decline, or to put it another way why are Lows so much more powerful than Highs?
Isn't it counter-intuitive?

Stranger still the Lows are divided, when these polar points appear they dot the charts with twice as many Low and High centres. What is going on?
There must be a rational explanation and it must fit easily into regular physics that anyone can understand.

When I first started posting to newsgroups I was still struggling to make sense with it all. Stupidly, I expected to learn from my superiors. It wasn't long before I was ignorantly losing my temper.
I imagine all first-year students doing physics are weeded out from Weather courses in the same way I might have been, had I an education worth a damn, fortunately I had something akin to dyslexia instead.
Working your way through problems, half blinded by what you are learning, all your jumbled thoughts pour out un-straightened. Reading them is like climbing barbed wire. And it didn't help that I cultivated an English "side" just to get even for the adhominem attacks. A tip: If you like your revenge cold:
Take the time to look up big words and always double check your spelling and grammar.
 There is a storm out in the Atlantic. The skies are grey and not warm. Roaring surf, breaking ashore with more white horses being born. I can feel the west wind blowing. The horizon is smeared away. No boats out tonight. But a few souls alone.

I can see these things happen from a foreign shore, I can remember winter nights like this that I will see no more.
I can hear the pebbles rattle, with every wave they change; one storm takes them such a way, the next they’re back again. I can see the sand, like blizzards and sometimes even foam blowing in the evening light, making the air groan.
I remember my eyes smarting and the sea shore smell of life. The sea holly and the litter; the tawdry businesses on the beach shut up for the night. The land birds gone inshore, the sea birds, who knows where?

Even the perverts huddled in their tight empty shells have found another toilet
What dead fish!